Archive

14 Sep Why the Read & React is More Interesting Than Traditional Offense

I think about the Read & React A LOT. I mean, it is my job. I answer questions about it, write articles about it, I edit all the scripts, and as scary as it sounds, Rick and I talk about it over meals, on the flights...

22 Jul Origins of the Read & React

This article was published today in Basketball Times so I thought it may be of some interest to the Tribe, especially those who are new to the R&R. Several events in my life along with many lingering thoughts about basketball ultimately led to the creation of the Read & React. This article describes a couple - there are more that may be published in the future. There is very little teaching in here, it's just a story about how I reached my breaking point with traditional offense. Just over 10 years ago, after a rather average season, my assistant coach asked me if I was happy. It didn’t take long for the words, “Not particularly” to escape my lips. He knew that I was frustrated with the season, with myself, with... the job. “What would you do differently if you could scrap our entire program and start over?” he probed. Again, it didn’t take me long to respond because I’d thought about that very thing almost every day. “I would teach our kids how to play the entire game by principle.” I, of course, knew his next question before he said it, “Why don’t you do it?” The honest answer was simple: I didn’t know how. I had a lot of pieces; a lot of 2-man and 3-man game principles, but not the entire thing. It seemed like a pretty tall order to create a seamless offensive system that would tie together transition, man-to-man, and zone without contradiction. And, it couldn’t be limited to only one formation like 5 OUT, or demand a certain type of players, or a particular style of play because my players and talent level changed every year.

06 Jul Hundreds of Tiny Successes

During last month’s Read & React Clinic in Detroit, I got the opportunity to spend some time with a coach who ran a basketball club in Ireland. His club ranged from ages 6 - 64. They had chosen the R&R as their club curriculum and...

01 Jun Read & React versus Dribble Drive Attack

I’ve been asked from time to time to compare the Dribble Drive Motion Offense to the Read & React Offense. In order to make a fair comparison, a person should view the DVDs of both offenses, watch teams that run the offenses in real games, and talk to coaches who are sold on each offense. I’ve done all three, which might make me uniquely qualified to make the comparison. Admittedly, as the creator of the Read & React Offense, I bring a bias to the table. This bias might be a factor if we were comparing two offenses that were both 4 OUT 1 IN sets with an emphasis on creating dribble drive opportunities, but since the comparison is really “apples vs oranges”, my bias shouldn’t enter the equation. I would never attempt to speak for Coach Walberg (the creator of the Dribble Drive Attack – which he prefers in place of Dribble Drive Motion). If you want to know his offense, along with the big picture and philosophy behind it, do like I did – watch his DVDs. Without any hesitation, I can say that I appreciate the problems that Coach Walberg was trying to fix when he created the DDA:

• How to allow players to take advantage of their dribble-drive-attacking skills without using set plays.
• How to draw upon the creativity of players (making it fun for them) and yet maximize their options if the defense stops their initial action.
• How to get the best spacing in a 4 OUT 1 IN set.

There’s more to the DDA than I can sum up in a single paragraph, so we should look at the bottom line: Does it work?